GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWING ARTICLES FOR PUBLICATION IN THE FINANCIAL INTERNET QUARTERLY
The guidelines for reviewing articles for publication in the Financial Internet Quarterly are in accordance with the ‘Good Practices in the academic peer reviewing process’ published by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education.
The editors cooperate with reviewers – recognized specialists in the field of finance who work with the quarterly as reviewers. Upon receipt of a proposal for an article and its acceptance by the topical editor, a potential reviewer is selected based upon their specialization in the field of the article. Other factors such as the reputation of the reviewer are also taken into consideration.
The potential reviewer receives an inquiry containing:
- title of the article,
- abstract of the article,
- information on the contents of the article,
- required deadline for receipt of the review,
- request for any further requirements (such as the need to deliver the source data upon which the research results of an article is based).
Reviewers are not to consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. To review each manuscript are appointed two independent reviewers from outside the research unit affiliated by the author of the manuscript.
Articles are reviewed anonymously on both the side of the author and the reviewer (double blind review). Evaluation of the reviewed text is done using the reviewer’s form.
All articles submitted to Financial Internet Quarterly are subject to verification by the UITM’s antyplagiat system.
Reviewers of articles published in 2018 and 2019:
- Agnieszka Bem, Wrocław University of Economics (Poland)
- Krzysztof Waliszewski, Poznań University of Economics and Business (Poland)
- Alcina Augusta de Sena Portugal Dias, University of Mihno (Portugal)
- Anna Białek-Jaworska, Warsaw University (Poland)
- Danuta Aniela Tomczak, Ostfold University College (Norway)
- Danuta Dziawgo, Nicolaus Copernicus University (Poland)
- Elina Kallas, University of Tartu (Estonia) *
- Eva Ropero Moriones, European University of Madrid (Spain)
- Hanna Szymborska, The Open University (United Kingdom)*
- Hervainé Szabó Gyöngyvér, Kodolányi János Főiskola (Hungary)
- Ingrid Majerová, Silesian University in Opava (Czech Republic)*
- Izabela Cichocka, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow (Poland)
- Jacek Rodzinka, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow (Poland)
- Kamil Gemra, Warsaw School of Economics (Poland)
- Leszek Dziawgo, Nicolaus Copernicus University (Poland)
- Marcin Pęksyk, The Gdansk School of Social and Economic Studies (Poland)
- Marcin Pielaszek, Warsaw School of Economics (Poland)
- Nebojša Stojčić, University of Dubrovnik (Croatia)*
- Paweł Perz, Rzeszow University of Technology (Poland)
- Piotr Modzelewski, Warsaw University (Poland)
- Shibeshi Kahsay, Higher Colleges of Technology w Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
- Tatiana Varcholova, University of Central Europe in Skalica (Slovakia)
- Tomáš Heryán, Silesian University in Opava (Czech Republic)*
- Tomáš Krabec, University of Economics (Czech Republic)
- Tomasz Skica, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow (Poland)
- Vahit Ferhan Benli, Istanbul Commerce University (Turkey)
- Volodymyr Martynyuk, Ternopil National Economic University (Ukraine)
- Jerzy Różański, University of Łódź (Poland)
*Cooperation with these scholars was made possible by the program “Reaching out to foreign reviewers” funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. Quarterly received this funding under the contract 921 / P-DUN / 2018 by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.